Download >> Download Sensory profile 2 user’s manual pdf
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here
The Sensory Profile™ 2 provides you with standardised tools to help evaluate a child’s sensory processing patterns in the context of home, school and community-based activities. It features a series of significantly revised questionnaires to evaluate a child’s unique sensory processing patterns from a position of strengths, providing deeper insight to help you customise the next steps. CONDUCT associated with sensory processing 27 85-96 More Than Others SOCIAL EMOTIONAL responses associated with sensory processing 56 97-99 Much More Than Others ATTENTIONAL responses associated with sensory processing 24 7-84 Just like the Majority of Others Child Sensory Profile™ 2 Summary Report, Page 5 Anna Sample. 2nd/4th cabinet Sensory Stimulation Training and Assessment Program 1979 J.A. Preston Corporation Children -1 kit Supplies a general level of functioning in the area of sensory processing and will provide indications of progress Assessment Lab- 4th cabinet The Short Child Occupational Profile Version 2.2. The Sensory Profile 2 August 2015 Overview The Sensory Profile 2 (Dunn, 2014) is a set of norm-referenced, standardized questionnaires designed to assess the sensory processing patterns of children from birth through 14 years, 11 months. The Sensory Profile 2 can be. Apr 01, 2018 What's new with the Sensory Profile 2 compared to the original Sensory Profile? Also, my clinic still utilizes the first version, how much longer will the original be available? Answer Some of the things have stayed the same from the first edition, and then some of the things are different based on the data and evidence. There are five versions.
Child Sensory Profile 2 User's Manual Pdf MakerOccupational therapists often use the Sensory Profile and the Sensory Processing Measure to assess the sensory needs of children. Therefore, it is important that the sensory processing scales that therapists use are reliable. The Sensory Processing Measure is a relatively new instrument, published in 2007, whereas the Sensory Profile appeared in 1999. The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability (internal consistency and inter-rater reliability) of the Sensory Profile, the Sensory Profile School Companion (SPSC), and the Home and Main Classroom Forms of the Sensory Processing Measure (SPM) in a cross-cultural setting. Parent participants (30 mothers and 30 fathers) each completed the Sensory Profile and the SPM–Home Form on the same child at ages between 5 and 10 years. Nineteen main classroom teachers of the same children then completed the SPSC and the SPM–Main Classroom Form. The internal consistency Cronbach alpha coefficients for the overall Sensory Profile, SPSC, SPM–Home Form, and SPM–Main Classroom Form were 0.97, 0.94, 0.93, and 0.86 respectively. The inter-rater reliability intra-class correlation coefficients for the overall Sensory Profile and SPM–Home Form were 0.48 (p = .48) and 0.63 (p = .005). Overall, the Sensory Profile and the SPM were found to have adequate levels of internal consistency. The Sensory Profile and SPM–Home Form exhibited moderate levels of inter-rater reliability. This study contributes to the evidence base and body of knowledge regarding internal consistency and inter-rater reliability, which previously consisted of the few studies reported in the respective Sensory Profile and SPM test manuals. This study also demonstrates that the Sensory Profile and SPM are reliable when used in a cross-cultural context. Sensory Processing Measure
Keywords: Sensory processing, child, occupational therapy, reliability, sensation, Sensory Profile, Sensory Processing Measure
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2020
Categories |